Prompt
Corrective Action (PCA) is a safeguarding framework applied by Reserve Bank of
India (RBI) on the functioning of banks in the country. PCA guidelines are
prefixed by RBI. PCA risk threshold are mainly defined in terms of Capital,
Asset Quality, Profitability, and Leverage:
Exhibit
: PCA Indicators
|
|
Capital
|
CRAR-
Minimum regulatory prescription for Capital to Risk Assets Ratio + applicable
Capital Conservation Buffer (CCB)
Current
minimum RBI prescription is 10.875% (9% minimum total capital plus 1.875% of
CCB).
And/Or
Common
Equity Tier 1 (CET 1 minimum) + applicable CCB.
Current
minimum RBI prescription is 7.375% (5.5% plus 1.875% of CCB)
|
Asset
Quality
|
Net
Non-performing advances (NNPA) ratio.
This
should be maintained at less than 6%.
|
Profitability
|
Return
on assets (ROA) (ROA is the percentage of profit after tax to average total
assets).
Banks
should not have negative ROA for two consecutive years.
|
Leverage
|
Tier
1 Leverage ratio.
This
should be maintained above 4%.
|
Any
bank breaching/ not maintaining the risk threshold set under the guidelines is
subject to imposing of PCA restrictions by RBI. Banks falling under PCA face
restriction/control on credit expansions, and are required to reduce risk
assets, loan concentrations apart from many other corrective actions to be
taken as per RBI directives.
The
spiralling level of growing NPAs (reached to about Rs.10.39 trillions in FY 18)
in the country has led to eleven public sector banks namely Allahabad Bank,
Bank of India, Bank of Maharashtra, Central Bank of India, Corporation Bank,
Dena Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Uco Bank
and United Bank of India, falling under PCA.
When
eleven out of the 21 public sector banks face PCA with resultant credit
restrictions/controls then it causes cascading negative effects on the industry
and industrial growth which is already struggling in a recessionary
environment. However, the issue does not end at the formal credit restrictions.
PCA comes with its adverse side effects also.
The
credit restriction/controls have not only stopped the new credit dispersion, it
has affected also the existing credit baskets. The managements of these banks have
become comparatively conservative and cautious in their approach in rolling
over of even the existing credit facilities to the industries by increasing the
pricing, margins, and stipulating various other terms and conditions which are difficult
to afford when industries are still adjusting to the double whammy impact of
demonetization and GST. LoU/LoC instruments helping in availing finance at
cheaper cost in Buyer’s Credit route have been already discontinued by the
regulator. The liquidity crisis caused by IL&FS fiasco has further worsened
the situation.
Many
of the corporate borrowers already suffering from lower demand, shrinking
margins, extended operating cycles, stretched receivable periods, tight
liquidity position have been told by PCA banks to find new lenders to shift the
existing credit facilities or for meeting their additional credit requirements.
However, the non PCA banks have been also treading cautiously in their lending
approach towards such borrowers or avoiding exposure to credit starve sectors
such as steel, infrastructure, construction, textile etc. In fact some of the
non PCA banks lowered their bank line exposure to PCA banks and started
directly/indirectly declining discounting of bills issued under the LCs of PCA
banks. Such reactions within banking industry have disappointed MSME/mid
corporate borrowers.
As
per Economic indicators, the growth in credit to industry was virtually nil in
first nine months of FY 2018-19. The growth of 7.70% reflected in bank credits
during the first nine months of FY 2018-19 is mainly driven by retail and
service sectors and manufacturing sector is lagging behind on this front. As
per Index of Industrial Production (IIP) numbers, as of Nov 2018, the growth in
IIP was mere 5%. In this environment, the formal impact of PCA on credit
control has caused multi fold impact with indirect hit of credit squeeze.
Many
borrowers have been cancelled sanctioned limits/loans by PCA banks. This has
affected the business plans of corporates specially the MSME/mid corporates. The
funding starvation caused by PCA forced many entrepreneurs to scale down/shelve
their project plans. The sudden credit squeeze caused by these banks have
created enormous pressure on the liquidity of MSME/mid corporates. Many corporate are still struggling to adjust
to this new situation. If the situation persists for long, the entrepreneurs
may throw the towel and there could be increase in NPAs.
While
efforts are being made by policy makers to salvage the economy from recession
and encourage entrepreneurs for increasing private capital expenditure by
setting up Greenfield / Brownfield projects, the entrepreneurs are facing a
situation where banks are following cautious approach in corporate lending and
chasing retail business.
With
the Government’s lobbying with regulator in the positive environment of improving
recovery through IBC, improving performance of some of the PCA banks,
recapitalization of some of the banks by Govt/other stakeholders, change in
guard at the regulator etc., it is expected that RBI may bring some banks out
of PCA. In fact recently, RBI has decided to release Bank of India, Bank of
Maharashtra, and Oriental Bank of Commerce from PCA. The fresh capital infusion
announced by GoI for Allahabad Bank and Corporation Bank is also expected to
help these banks coming out of PCA. Restoration of LoU/LoC for availing Buyer’s
Credit with proper safeguards would be a boost not only to the corporate sector
but also to the businesses of the foreign branches of Indian banks. Presently,
when banks are competing to garner deposits at higher costs, a low rate of
interest regime seems to be a distant dream, but if it happens (considering the
GoI’s/regulator’s efforts in this direction), it would be a blessing in
disguise for the industries. These positive measures would help in improving
the liquidity starving industries and avoid unwanted new NPAs. However, the pain caused by PCA coupled
with impact of LoU/LoC ban, IL&FS debacle and other such events, leading to
credit squeeze shall be an unforgettable excruciating experience for the
entrepreneurs and financial market forever.
Disclaimer: The views
expressed in the article above are personal views of the author and should not
be thought to represent official views, ideas, or policies of any agency or institution.
*****